Fighting corruption with social accountability: a comparative analysis of social accountability mechanisms' potential to reduce corruption in public administration (Record no. 100852)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01989pab a2200217 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b2013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Schatz, Florian
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Fighting corruption with social accountability: a comparative analysis of social accountability mechanisms' potential to reduce corruption in public administration
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2013
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.161-174.
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Aug
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Given the poor track record of traditional anti-corruption initiatives, donors and governments are increasingly looking at how civil society can fight corruption in public administration. Social accountability mechanisms intend to perform this role by holding officials directly accountable through citizen engagement. However, this article argues that social accountability mechanisms are only capable of reducing corruption systemically if they activate horizontal accountability and sustain it through the sanctioning mechanisms of electoral accountability. A comparative case study analysis using the cases of the Ugandan Public Expenditure Tracking Survey and the Bangalore Citizen Report Card is applied to test this hypothesis. The Tanzanian Public Expenditure Tracking Survey and an example of citizen engagement in Mumbai are employed as shadow cases to provide additional evidence for the hypothesis. The results indicate that social accountability mechanisms must be inclusive, broad, with public effect and embedded in other accountability relationships to fight corruption effectively. Electoral accountability is key, and support to social accountability mechanisms should therefore always be well placed within a broader agenda aimed at strengthening democratic governance. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Citizen participation
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Public sector accountability
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Public administration
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Corruption
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Social accountability
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Public Administration and Development
908 ## - PUT COMMAND PARAMETER (RLIN)
Put command parameter N
909 ## -
-- 100853
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 33, Issue no: 3 AR101313 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha