| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
01361pab a2200181 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
180718b2014 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Varghese, Rajan |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
The relevance of 'Wednesbury unreasonableness' in the light of 'proportionality' as a ground for judicial review |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2014 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
| Extent |
p.89-104. |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Jan-Mar |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc. |
The principle of primary review and proportionality on the one hand and the principle of secondary review and Wednesbury reasonableness on the other hand gave a new dimension to Administrative Law, the former applying in the case of fundamental freedoms and the latter, in other cases. Proportionality as a legal test is capable of being more precise than a reasonableness test, besides requiring a more intrusive review of a decision made by public authority. Judicial verdicts have not openly held that the proportionality test may replace the Wednesbury test. Practically what is found is that the proportionality te3st is applied more and more, when there is violation of human rights and fundamental freedom and theWednesbury finds its presence more on the domestic law when there are violations of a citizens ordinary rights. - Reproduced. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Administrative law |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Judiciary |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
| Main entry heading |
Indian Journal of Public Administration |
| 908 ## - PUT COMMAND PARAMETER (RLIN) |
| Put command parameter |
N |
| 909 ## - |
| -- |
104108 |