| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01251pab a2200193 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180718b2014 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Atkinson, Michael M. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Why do governments use pay for performance? Contrasting theories and interview evidence |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2014 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
p.436-458. |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
|---|
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Sep |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
In Canada, pay-for-performance (PFP) systems to compensate senior public servants have been established in several jurisdictions despite arguments by academics who doubt their efficacy in public sector environments characterized by high levels of intrinsic motivation. This article traces the pattern of PFP in Canada and distinguishes among ﾓaggressive,ﾔ ﾓpassive,ﾔ and ﾓreluctantﾔ regimes. It explores why PFP is growing in popularity despite its acknowledged limitations. We canvass three theoretical perspectives and review evidence from interviews with key officials in a number of jurisdictions. The article contributes to our knowledge of managerial innovations by revealing the variety of motivations behind PFP. - |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Performance appriasal |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Kim, Boa |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Fulton, Murray |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Canadian Public Administration |
| 908 ## - PUT COMMAND PARAMETER (RLIN) |
|---|
| Put command parameter |
N |
| 909 ## - |
|---|
| -- |
106491 |
