How cohesive is the Chinese bureaucracy? a case study of street-level bureaucrats in China (Record no. 115744)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01754pab a2200181 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Zang, Xiaowei
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title How cohesive is the Chinese bureaucracy? a case study of street-level bureaucrats in China
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2017
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.217-226.
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Aug
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Institutional analyses of the developmental state claim that the principal source of state capacity is internal cohesiveness, which is defined as the tendency for the rank and file of the civil service to be in unity while working together towards national goals. In the literature on the China model, the strong capacity of the Chinese state has been taken for granted, and internal cohesiveness in the Chinese bureaucracy has not been problematized. This knowledge gap is narrowed by studying data on the Bureau of Urban Management (i.e. Chengguan) in China. Recent studies are reviewed of bureaucratic logics and behaviour that question the extent of collaboration between higher authorities and their subordinates (i.e. vertical cohesiveness) in China. Next, the essay theorizes about how these bureaucratic logics may also undermine collaboration among government bureaus (horizontal cohesiveness). Background information is offered about Chengguan and reports on the challenges identified by Chengguan officers to work with people in other bureaus. The research does not find any solid evidence of horizontal cohesiveness in the Chinese bureaucracy. This calls for an effort to reassess the validity of the China model. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Case studies - Bureaucracy
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Bureaucracy - China
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Bureaucracy
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Public Administration and Development
909 ## -
-- 115750
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 37, Issue no: 3 AR116210 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha