What do we mean when we say "Professionalism"?: a language usage analysis for public adminstration (Record no. 27559)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01158pab a2200133 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Fox Charles J.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title What do we mean when we say "Professionalism"?: a language usage analysis for public adminstration
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation 22(1), Mar 1992, p.1-17
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This paper analyses use of the term professionalism in public administration by language usage analysis - an interpretive methodology. It begins by arguing against state interpret of professionalism implied by the sociological model. It then explores various meaning of professionalism by using a series of antinomies: Professional - laity, professional amateur, achievement ascription, and professionals as new class in opposition to other classes. Each antinomy reveals meaning of professionalism that public administrators should avoid or embrace in their quest to make public administration a widely recognised profession. Conduding remarks suggest a particular definition of professionalism appropriate to public ad
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Public Administration -- Professions
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Review of Public Administration
909 ## -
-- 27559
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 AR27661 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha