Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: an assessment of methods and quality (Record no. 28005)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01191pab a2200145 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Adams Guy B.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: an assessment of methods and quality
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation 54(6), Nov-Dec 1994, p.565-76
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. How does dissertation research in public administration compare with cognate fields in terms of method and quality? Guy B. Adams and Jay D. White compare the dissertation research from 1992 in public administration, criminology, management, planning, social work and women's studies. Comparative findings are presented on methods used, on the general characteristic of the dissertations, and quality. The lack of theoretical research, or even theoretically-informed research, and the widespread presence of "mindless empiricism" across all six of the fields are major finding. The special features of public administration doctoral research, including "practice research" and "foreign focus" dissertations, along with th
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Public Administration -- Research -- U.S.A.
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name While Jay D.
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Public Administration Review
909 ## -
-- 28005
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 AR28107 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha