Critical theory and the paradox of discourse (Record no. 35349)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01534pab a2200157 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Box, Richard C.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Critical theory and the paradox of discourse
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1995
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.1-19
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Mar
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The work of public administration theorists who argue for a broader sphere of administrative discretion falls into three broad paradigms: the legitimacy paradigm, the guardian paradigm, and the critical paradigm. Legitimacy theorists argue for recognition within the Constitutional framework, and guardian theorists argue for more discretion for administrators to govern for the uninformed public. Neither view has much practical impact because neither fits American attitudes toward government. The critical paradigm advocates providing citizens with information so they may take action and free themselves from domination by elites. The critical view involves less, rather than more, formal power for professional administrators and puts them at odds with the elected officials who employ them. The paper seeks to determine whether this view of the role of the public administrator accurately portrays the nature of the relationship between citizens and government and whether the public administrator can be an effective agent of change by becoming an information provider instead of seeking greater institutional power. - Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Public administration
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Review of Public Administration
909 ## -
-- 35349
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 25, Issue no: 1 AR35593 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha