| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01300pab a2200169 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180718b1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Farmer, David John |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Leopards in the temple: bureaucracy and the limits of the in-between |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
1997 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
p.507-28 |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
|---|
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Nov |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
This article examines a core problematic of bureaucracy. It suggests that the study of bureaucracy should make a clearer nonbureaucratic turn, focusing appropriately on what is described as the in-between. Analysis of structural limits of the in-between - hierarchy and lateralization - should center on the nonbureaucratic. Structure is not the central issue. Rather, structure is a surrogate for competing manifest and latent nonbureaucratic perspectives. Hierarchy is a surrogate not only for a rational order of justice but also for the feasibility of epistemological certainty. Lateralaization is a surrogate not only for human autonomy but also for skepticism and hesitation in knowing. The study of bureaucracy cannot be limited satisfactorily to "bureaucratic man." Rather, humans are irreducibly bio-psycho-spirituo-social-cultural beings. - Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Bureaucracy |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Farmer, Rosemary L. |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Administration and Society |
| 909 ## - |
|---|
| -- |
37371 |
