What do administrators think citizen think? administrator predictions as an adjunct to citizen surveys (Record no. 38557)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01805pab a2200169 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Melkers, Julia
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title What do administrators think citizen think? administrator predictions as an adjunct to citizen surveys
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1998
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.327-34
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Jul-Aug
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Should we care whether administrators can predict citizen perceptions? This paper examines whether administrator predictions of citizen views could be a useful adjunct to citizen surveys. Where previous research on citizen satisfaction has addressed principally the citizen viewpoint, the authors argue that asking administrators to predict citizen perspectives can have a number of benefits, ranging from showing administrators where their perceptions of the public are accurate or inaccurate to improving employee morale (if, as expected, administrators are pessimistic about citizen opinions). To assess these possible benefits, this paper compares findings from two surveys in the City of Atlanta: (1) a first survey that asked a sample of city residents about a broad range of city services and facilities and (2) a second survey that asked administrators from a number of municipal departments to predict citizen responses on selected questions. Findings show that municipal administrators tend to be pessimistic about citizen ratings, expecting more negative evaluations than citizens actually report. Those tendencies vary among departments, however, for a variety of reasons. Overall, the results suggest that administrator predictions are worth considering as an additional component to citizen surveys. - Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Public administration
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Clayton, John
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Public Administration Review
909 ## -
-- 38557
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 58, Issue no: 4 AR38912 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha