Comparing three lenses of policy choice (Record no. 40098)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 00977pab a2200157 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Zahariadis, Nikolaos
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparing three lenses of policy choice
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1998
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.434-48
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Autumn
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This paper compares three lenses that explain policy choice. They include rational choice, advocacy coalitions, and multiple streams. The argument is that the three lenses generate complementary rather than competing explanations of the same event. Complementary lenses are those that are not applicable under the same conditions. Applicability of each lens is established by examining actor goals and environmental structure and by exploring predictive capability and descriptive accuracy. Finally, the paper charts a research agenda designed to make the lenses more directly competing. - Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Public policy
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Policy Studies Journal
909 ## -
-- 40098
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 26, Issue no: 3 AR40470 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha