| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
02084pab a2200181 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180718b2000 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Anderson, Jon |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
The present and future of public sector extension in Africa: contracting out or contracting in? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2000 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
p.373-84 |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
|---|
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Dec |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Public sector extension has come under increasing pressure to downsize and reform. Contracting out - the use of public sector funds to contract non-governmental and private service providers - is often held up as a potential tool in reform efforts. Much has been written about the possible advantages of contracting out of agricultural extension and it is being encouraged and promoted by numerous international organizations. However, a look at field experience in Africa shows that contracting out is relatively infrequent, especially compared with the reverse - contracting in - where private sector and non-governmental organizations finance public sector extension delivery. Case studies from Uganda and Mozambique indicate than on the ground attempts to come up with solutions to providing services to farmers are resulting in innovative contracting approaches and combined public and private institutional arrangements. Contracting in and public-private coalition approaches, in contrast to purely public sector extension (characterized by ineffectiveness and inefficiencies) and purely private for profit extension (which may ignore public goods and concerns), may help achieve extension services which are both demand led and which internalize public concerns such as environmental protection, food security and socio-economic equity. These coalition approaches can be improved and facilitated. They deserve greater analysi s and may contribute to a better understanding of extension contracting and the roles of private and public organizations. - Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Public sector - Africa |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Public sector |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Crowder, L. Van |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Public Administration and Development |
| 909 ## - |
|---|
| -- |
47802 |
