| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
01336pab a2200181 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
180718b2001 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Broughton, Charles |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
Reconsidering the revolution? Australian public sector administration in 2000 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2001 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
| Extent |
p.81-88 |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Mar |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc. |
While the year 2000 was memorable for public administration in Australia it was notable mainly for the unexpected. Success occurred where risk and failure were predicted. Failure emerged where success had been talked-up. Notable examples include the so-called Y2K problem, management of the Olympic Games, and the introduction of the GST, and the outsourcing of government services (especially Information Technology (IT)). Also memorable were important shifts in the policy fields of defence and welfare. The Howard government ended the year in decision-making and largese mode - setting the agenda for the following election year. The events of 2000 invite reconsideration of the merits of the traditional bureaucratic model and those of the emerging post-bureaucratic models of service provision. - Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Public administration - Australia |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Public administration |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Chalmers, Jim |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
| Main entry heading |
Australian Journal of Public Administration |
| 909 ## - |
| -- |
48435 |