How do legislators assess administrative performance? Georgia's Department of transportation in the eyes of the state's legislators (Record no. 509486)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01964nam a2200181 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190510b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Thomas, John Clayton
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title How do legislators assess administrative performance? Georgia's Department of transportation in the eyes of the state's legislators
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2018
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.822-835.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc State legislatures and their member legislators serve as important overseers to state administrative departments, charged to function as principals relative to departmental agents. Yet, we know relatively little about how legislators assess the performance of those departments. This research is designed to improve that knowledge through an exploratory analysis of how and why legislators in one state assess the performance of a large state government department. Using data from a survey of Georgia state legislators, the article explores legislator evaluations of the state’s Department of Transportation (GDOT) and the factors that may underlie those evaluations. The findings suggest that legislators assess administrative performance on three principal dimensions: (a) administrative service to individual legislators, (b) assistance to the legislature as a whole, and (c) performance in meeting the state’s transportation needs. Those assessments appear to be shaped by legislator perceptions of (a) personal interactions with the department and (b) the quality of specific GDOT products and services. These and earlier findings suggest that the focus of public performance measurement systems might be broadened to include measures of personal treatment by administrative agencies in addition to traditional objective service outcome measures. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Performance appraisal
9 (RLIN) 5355
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Su, Min
9 (RLIN) 5356
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Poister, Theodore H.
9 (RLIN) 5357
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Review of Public Administration
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP Legislators
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2019-05-10 48(8), Nov, 2018: p.822-835. AR119657 2019-05-10 Articles

Powered by Koha