Why might developers be reluctant to build conservation subdivisions? insights from spatial regression analysis (Record no. 509690)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01463nam a2200157 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190520b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mohamed, Rayman
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Why might developers be reluctant to build conservation subdivisions? insights from spatial regression analysis
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2018
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.1170-1190.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Despite evidence that households pay more for lots or houses in conservation subdivisions, developers are sometimes reluctant to build them. I use a spatial autoregressive model to shed light on this contradiction. The presence of nearby conservation lots reduces the value of a given conservation lot. I present two possible explanations for this result: (1) Lots located close to each other are indicative of higher density, which is frowned upon by Americans, and (2) conservation lots compete for views and rural aesthetics, and the construction of one lot decreases their availability to other lots. Results for other independent variables corroborate these explanations. Developers’ reluctance to embrace conservation subdivisions in some locations might be a result of regulations that discourage their development. More research is needed on how regulations for conservation subdivisions vary across the United States and how these affect developers’ decisions. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Spacial econometric model
9 (RLIN) 5988
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Urban Affairs Review
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP Housing
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2019-05-20 54(6), Nov, 2018: p.1170-1190. AR119803 2019-05-20 Articles

Powered by Koha