Social vulnerability and procedural equity: Exploring the distribution of disaster aid across counties in the United States (Record no. 512859)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02031nam a2200157 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 191223b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Domingue, Simone J.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Social vulnerability and procedural equity: Exploring the distribution of disaster aid across counties in the United States
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc American Review of Public Administration
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 49(8), Nov, 2019: p.897-913.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc To date, there has been limited research conducted on disaster aid allocation across multiple regions and disasters within the United States. In addition, there is a paucity of research specifically connecting social indicators of vulnerability to public assistance grants aimed at restoring, rebuilding, and mitigating against future damages in disasters. Given these gaps, this article inquires as to whether the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA’s) public assistance program is characterized by procedural inequities, or disparate outcomes for counties with more socially vulnerable populations. Specifically, this article analyzes county-level FEMA’s Public Assistance distribution following major disaster declarations, while controlling for damages sustained, population, household counts, and FEMA Region. Results indicate that FEMA’s Public Assistance program operates well when accounting only for disaster losses across the years, however, findings also show that county social conditions influence funding receipt. Although socioeconomic characteristics were significant drivers of assistance spending, additional vulnerability indicators related to county demographic and built environment characteristics were also important drivers of receipt. Cases of both procedural inequity and equity are highlighted, and implications for equitable disaster recovery are discussed along with recommendations. - Reproduced.
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Emrich, Christopher T.
9 (RLIN) 14827
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Review of Public Administration
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP Disaster relief - United States
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2019-12-23 49(8), Nov, 2019: p.897-913. AR122188 2019-12-23 Articles

Powered by Koha