The limits of proceduralism: Critical remarks on the rise of ‘throughput legitimacy’ (Record no. 513624)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01528nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 200313b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Steffek, Jens
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The limits of proceduralism: Critical remarks on the rise of ‘throughput legitimacy’
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Public Administration
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 97(4), 2019: p.784-796.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Throughput legitimacy’ is among the most successful conceptual innovations that scholars of public policy and administration have produced in recent years. I argue that this new understanding of legitimacy needs to be seen in the context of an increasing proceduralism in political science and public administration. Throughput legitimacy attracted so much attention because it is the perfect normative companion to the analytical concept of governance. Governance is procedure, and throughput legitimacy tells us what good procedures are. In my critical discussion of this innovation I examine the analytical value of the concept, as well as its normative and practical implications. I argue that, regarding concept formation, throughput legitimacy may enrich existing typologies of legitimacy but at the same time has a severe problem of fuzzy borders. Politically, throughput legitimacy lends itself to apologetic uses when it is applied as a tailor‐made normative standard for technocratic, non‐majoritarian institutions. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Legitimacy
9 (RLIN) 16813
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Public Administration
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP Public administration
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2020-03-13 97(4), 2019: p.784-796. AR122777 2020-03-13 Articles

Powered by Koha