| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01295nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
201027b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Fraenkel, Jon. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
'Uncle Tom’ dilemma: Minorities in power-sharing arrangements |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
International Political Science Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
41(1), Jan, 2020: p.124-137 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
Mandatory power-sharing laws aim to balance power between groups in contexts where majoritarian democracy might disadvantage minorities. Yet, unless veto arrangements are in place, cabinet-level decision-making usually continues to operate under majority rule. Minority parties participating in such power-sharing executives may lose support in their own communities owing to a failure to deliver substantial reforms or to advance minority objectives and become seen as ‘Uncle Tom’ type figures who no longer represent their own community. This article explores examples of these dilemmas facing power-sharing cabinets in Zimbabwe, South Africa, Bosnia–Herzegovina, Fiji, and the French Pacific territory of New Caledonia.- Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Power-sharing, Bosnia–Herzegovina, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Fiji, New Caledonia |
| 9 (RLIN) |
18942 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
International Political Science Review |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
DEMOCRACY |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
