State behaviour at the universal periodic review: An examination of India’s third review at the United Nations human rights council (Record no. 515458)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02020nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210129b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Kamath, Ashwath
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title State behaviour at the universal periodic review: An examination of India’s third review at the United Nations human rights council
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc India Quarterly
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 76(2), Jun, 2020: p.185-206
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has been a promising instrument in the hands of the United Nations Human Rights Council. With more emphasis on constructive criticism than an adversarial approach, it was thought that this method would help states to improve their human rights records. This article takes the case of India’s last review through this process and derives various trends and patterns of interaction with other states. It starts by outlining the process of the UPR itself and how it works procedurally, after which it highlights India’s presentation of its human rights record, and subsequently how the international community reacted to it. One of the core arguments of this article is that when it comes to human rights, it is important to analyse its politics through a regional lens since geographical continuities determine an overall outlook towards human rights and priorities that states highlight when they consider human rights records on the whole. This is further substantiated by looking at instances when bilateralism has not succeeded in its goals. It also makes certain statistical inferences after close examination of the recommendations posed by states, as well as India’s response (or lack thereof) to those recommendations. The article also highlights certain cases from India’s domestic developments to see how it plays out in the international community and their perception of India’s human rights record. –Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Human rights, Universal periodic review, India, HRC
9 (RLIN) 21053
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading India Quarterly
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP HUMAN RIGHTS
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2021-01-29 76(2), Jun, 2020: p.185-206 AR123943 2021-01-29 Articles

Powered by Koha