The managerial effects of algorithmic fairness activism (Record no. 515468)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01175nam a22001457a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210129b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Cowgill, B., Dell’Acqua, F. and Matz, S.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The managerial effects of algorithmic fairness activism
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc AEA Papers and Proceedings
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 110, May, 2020: p.85-90
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc How do ethical arguments affect AI adoption in business? We randomly expose business decision-makers to arguments used in AI fairness activism. Arguments emphasizing the inescapability of algorithmic bias lead managers to abandon AI for manual review by humans and report greater expectations about lawsuits and negative PR. These effects persist even when AI lowers gender and racial disparities and when engineering investments to address AI fairness are feasible. Emphasis on status quo comparisons yields opposite effects. We also measure the effects of "scientific veneer" in AI ethics arguments. Scientific veneer changes managerial behavior but does not asymmetrically benefit favorable (versus critical) AI activism.
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading AEA Papers and Proceedings
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2021-01-29 110, May, 2020: p.85-90 AR123953 2021-01-29 Articles

Powered by Koha