| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01468nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
210212b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Nickels, A., Clark, A.D. and Wood, Z.D. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
How municipal takeovers reshape urban democracy: Comparing the experiences of camden, new jersey and flint, michigan |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Urban Affairs |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
56(3), May, 2020: p.790-822 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
Municipal takeovers are a state policy ostensibly designed to address urban fiscal crises by “temporarily” taking over local government, suspending local control, and implementing sweeping austerity measures. Although framed as “apolitical,” takeovers have the capacity to reshape local democracy. These changes radically rearrange how decisions are made, who has access to decision makers, and, ultimately, who is in power. Using a policy-centered approach, we compare the cases of Camden, New Jersey and Flint, Michigan, illustrating how variations in policy design and localized implementation reshaped the local political landscape in different ways. While the Camden takeover institutionalized the emergent “community development regime,” Flints’ grassroots activists and community-based organizations destabilized the emergent regime. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Municipal takeover, Local governance, Urban regime, Fiscal crisis, Policy design |
| 9 (RLIN) |
22294 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Urban Affairs |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT - INDIA |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
