Consensus and dissensus in comparative politics: Do comparativists agree on the goals, methods, and results of the field? (Record no. 516475)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01670nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210226b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Roberts, Andrew
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Consensus and dissensus in comparative politics: Do comparativists agree on the goals, methods, and results of the field?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc International Political Science Review
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 41(4), Sep, 2020: p.490-506
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Are comparative political scientists divided over the goals, methods, and results of their field? This article attempts to answer this question, drawing on an original survey of US-based political scientists. The main conclusion is that there is relative consensus on the goals of research—comparativists favor broad generalizations and causal inference—but there is also acceptance of a variety of methodological approaches, both qualitative and quantitative, in pursuing this goal. Comparativists, however, show less agreement on substantive findings in the areas of democracy and democratic politics, economy and society, and political institutions. Interestingly, generational differences are relatively infrequent, but gender differences on issues such as rational choice and causal inference are more prominent, possibly contributing to gendered citation bias. The findings suggest that comparative politics may not have accumulated a large amount of agreed-upon knowledge, but that there is substantial agreement on the path forward. – Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Comparative politics, Expert survey, Methodology, Political scientists
9 (RLIN) 22991
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading International Political Science Review
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP COMPARATIVE POLITICS
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2021-02-26 41(4), Sep, 2020: p.490-506 AR124458 2021-02-26 Articles

Powered by Koha