| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01350nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
210226b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Zyla, Benjamin |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Eclecticism and the future of the Burden-sharing research programme: Why Trump is wrong |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
International Political Science Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
41(4), Sep, 2020: p.507-521 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
Since the birth of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Europeans and the Americans have disagreed about who should share how much of the collective security burden. The input side of alliance burden sharing – that is, how many troops a member state contributes to the alliance – has been the privileged variable, both at the political as well as the academic levels. Other output variables (e.g. numbers of troops deployed to a particular mission) are highly contested. This article offers an analytically eclecticist framework for studying Atlantic burden sharing that allows combining variables on the input and output sides of the alliance burden sharing debate with those that consider it a social practice. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Collective action, Post-positivism, Institutionalism, International organizations, Burden sharing |
| 9 (RLIN) |
22995 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
International Political Science Review |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
