| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
01536nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
210702b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Su, Min |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
Taxation by citation: Exploring local governments’ revenue motive for traffic fines |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Public Administration Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
| Extent |
80(1), Jan-Feb, 2020: p.36-45 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc |
Anecdotal evidence suggests that local governments may have a revenue motive for traffic fines, beyond public safety concerns. Using California's county-level data over a 12-year period, this article shows that counties increased per capita traffic fines by 40 to 42 cents immediately after a 10 percentage point tax revenue loss in the previous year; however, these counties did not reduce traffic fines if they experienced a tax revenue increase in the previous year. This finding indicates that county governments probably view traffic fines as a revenue source to offset tax revenue loss, but not as a revenue stabilizer to manage revenue fluctuation. This article also finds that low-income and Hispanic-majority counties raised more traffic fines. Counties that generated more revenue from the hotel tax—a tax typically paid by travelers and visitors—raised more traffic fines, indicating a possible tax-exporting behavior by shifting the traffic fine burden to nonlocal drivers. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Local governments, Traffic fines, Hotel tax, |
| 9 (RLIN) |
26201 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
| Main entry heading |
Public Administration Review |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
| Subject DIP |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT - FINANCE |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
| Item type |
Articles |