| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01383nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
210715b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Christnsen, T. et al |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Reputation management by Chinese universities: Primary profile and comparative features |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Public Administration: An International Quarterly |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
98(4), Dec, 2020: p.1027-1043 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
In this study, we analyse data from 176 Chinese universities to examine the use of reputation symbols on official websites. We find that Chinese universities prefer professional and performative symbols more than moral symbols. Reputation symbols are mainly observed in teaching, research, history and strategy categories, whereas their use in internal operations and the external environment is limited. A comparison with samples from the United States and Nordic countries indicates that their universities differ in the use of reputation symbols, with relatively high emphasis on professional and moral symbols, respectively. This difference can be attributed to divergent national cultures, higher education regimes and globalization. Here, we discuss the implications of our findings on reputation management by universities in a globalized world. – Reproduced |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Public Administration: An International Quarterly |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
ADMINISTRATIVE REPUTATION |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
