Of perpetual becoming, Informal as a life space (Record no. 517606)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02529nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210722b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Benjamin, Solomon
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Of perpetual becoming, Informal as a life space
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Seminar: Cradle of Diversity
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 736, Dec, 2020: p.57-63
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc CAN we think of the term ‘informal’ as a ‘flexible’ space where indeterminacy and opacity opens up possibility? This perspective contrasts the way most planners, policy makers, many academicians and activists feel the need to ‘fix the chaos’ of the city by making transparent. The key assumption by ‘experts’, is essentially to provide or show ‘ordinary’ people ways to access a ‘rights’ based development of ‘livelihoods, adequate housing, infrastructure for basic needs, while competitively provide high end services to attract global investments towards ‘economic growth’.

The physical form that reflects in such vision is clean (and usually barren) streets, new cities such as Chandigarh, or Brazil’s Brasilia, and to govern them via neat bureaucratic offices now endowed with computer managed systems housing complete citizen databases with adequate privacy safeguards. Instead, and metaphorically, our research time and again suggests the contrary: it is the clustering of the ‘messy’ bazaar – of pavement shops of seemingly chaotic electrical power lines, and neighborhoods that have houses incorporating shops, and shops being extension of workshops and factories, that actually form the lifeline.

Importantly, we could then think of this ‘chaotic’ city as spaces of ‘perpetual becoming’ – a concept by Shetty, Gupte, and Khanolkar.1 For them, this is where people learn to ‘work the system’ – to get services, to find new ways of making or fabricating things, to locate social and political connections to stabilize the economy, and places for day to day domestics; importantly, they see ‘settling’ that remains as an active space: it is where such practices done again and again, and by numerous people learning, copying and modifying from earlier ways, to consolidate these into commonplace social conventions. The ‘informal’ is here, thinking the city as spaces of practice – what Simone and Uzair Fauzan usefully build around the idea of ‘surfacing via majority time. - Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element City, Economic growth
9 (RLIN) 27298
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Seminar: Cradle of Diversity
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP URBAN DEVELOPMENT
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2021-07-22 736, Dec, 2020: p.57-63 AR124883 2021-07-22 Articles

Powered by Koha