| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01415nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
210727b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Saunders, Monica Solinas |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
The U.S. federal response to Covid-19 during the first 3 months of the outbreak: Was an evidence-based approach an option? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
American Review of Public Administration |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.713-719 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
This essay is a commentary on the U.S. Federal government response to the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak. The focus is on the response of the Trump Administration during the first 3 months of the outbreak, specifically the period between January 20, 2020, and May 15, 2020. The following question is addressed: To what extent was the strategy implemented by the U.S. federal government guided by evidence-based decisions? While nobody was a COVID-19 expert at the beginning of the outbreak, this being a novel virus, the essay argues that the U.S. federal government failed to use evidence from previous pandemics and natural disasters and from the experience of other countries. In addition, the essay warns of the current lack of consistency in following data generated by U.S. agencies and institutions. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
COVID-19, Pandemic, Evidence-based approach |
| 9 (RLIN) |
25839 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
American Review of Public Administration |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
COVID 19 PANDEMIC |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
