Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict (Record no. 518863)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02074nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 211216b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Shah, Priti Pradhan et al
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Administrative Science Quarterly
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 66(2), Jun, 2021: p.426-474
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Teams scholars have historically conceptualized and measured intragroup conflict at the team level. But emerging evidence suggests that perceptions of intragroup conflict are often not uniform, shared, or static. These findings suggest important questions about the microfoundations of intragroup conflict: Where does conflict within teams originate? And how does it evolve over time? We address these and other questions in three abductive studies. We consider four origination points—an individual, dyad, subgroup, or team—and three evolutionary trajectories—conflict continuity, contagion, and concentration. Study 1, a qualitative study of narrative accounts, and Study 2, a longitudinal social networks study of student teams, reveal that fewer than 30 percent of teams experience team-level conflict. Instead, conflict more commonly originates and persists at individual, dyadic, or subgroup levels. Study 2 further demonstrates that traditional psychometric intragroup conflict scales mask the existence of these various origins and trajectories of conflict. Study 3, a field study of manufacturing teams, reveals that individual and dyadic task conflict origins positively predict team performance, whereas traditional intragroup task conflict measures negatively predict team performance. The results raise serious concerns about current methods and theory in the team conflict literature and suggest that researchers must go beyond team-level conceptualizations of conflict. – Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Dyadic conflict, Intragroup conflict, Subgroups, Temporal dynamics
9 (RLIN) 28852
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Administrative Science Quarterly
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2021-12-16 66(2), Jun, 2021: p.426-474 AR125907 2021-12-16 Articles

Powered by Koha