Public office and public trust: Standards of conduct in parliament: A comparative analysis of rules of conduct in three parliaments (Record no. 518880)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01394nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 211217b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Eert, Paul Bovend |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Public office and public trust: Standards of conduct in parliament: A comparative analysis of rules of conduct in three parliaments |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Parliamentary Affairs |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 73(2), Apr, 2020: p.296-322 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Many parliaments in the Western world presently feel the need to establish standards of conduct for their members to enhance the public’s trust in and authority of parliament. This article investigates, on the basis of three highly different but more or less representative practical examples of houses of parliaments, the subject of standards of conduct for members of parliament (MPs). From a constitutional law perspective, a comparative analysis is given of the content and scope of standards of conduct for MPs and the way these standards are enforced. The following topics are discussed: the power of a house of parliament to regulate standards of conduct; the legal status of MPs concerning standards of conduct; the free representational mandate of MPs in the context of conflicts of interest; rules of conduct advancing trust in parliament and enforcement mechanisms in parliament. – Reproduced |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Parliamentary Affairs |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | PARLIAMENT |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
No items available.