Psychological process of bureaucratic whistleblowing: Applying the theory of planned behavior (Record no. 518890)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02271nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 211218b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Lee, H., Kang, M.M. and Kim, S.Y.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Psychological process of bureaucratic whistleblowing: Applying the theory of planned behavior
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc American Review of Public Administration
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 51(5), Jul, 2021: p.374-392
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Whistleblowing is a psychological process that involves the calculation of risks and benefits. While there exists a broad range of research on whistleblowing in the public sector, previous studies have not examined its entire process due to the limited focus on either whistleblowing intention or whistleblowing behavior. This study aims to fill this gap by applying the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to the whistleblowing context. Specifically, we examine how individual beliefs about the likely consequences of whistleblowing (attitude toward whistleblowing), others’ expectations about whistleblowing (subjective norm), and the capability of blowing the whistle (perceived behavioral control) influence public employees’ actual whistleblowing by way of their intention to report wrongdoings. A series of structural equation models are tested using data from the 2010 Merit Principles Survey. The findings show that the more the employees perceive that the consequences of whistleblowing are important, the more the key referents support whistleblowing, and the more the protections for whistleblowers are available, the more likely are their intentions to disclose wrongdoings and then actually engage in whistleblowing behavior. We conduct additional analyses for internal and external whistleblowers separately and find that there are both meaningful similarities and differences between the two groups. This study provides support for the validity of TPB as a theoretical framework for better understanding and explicating the psychological process of bureaucratic whistleblowing. – Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Whistleblowing intention, Whistleblowing behavior, Theory of planned behavior, U.S. federal government, Structural equation modeling
9 (RLIN) 28898
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Review of Public Administration
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP WHISTERBLOWERS
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2021-12-18 51(5), Jul, 2021: p.374-392 AR125933 2021-12-18 Articles

Powered by Koha