Can poverty alleviation programs crowd-in private support? Short- and middle-run effects of a conditional cash transfer program on inter-household transfers (Record no. 519006)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01902nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220118b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Garcia, Sandra and Curates, Jorge
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Can poverty alleviation programs crowd-in private support? Short- and middle-run effects of a conditional cash transfer program on inter-household transfers
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Journal of Social Policy
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 50(3), Jul, 2021: p.511-532
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs have become an important component of social assistance in developing countries. CCTs, as well as other cash subsidies, have been criticized for allegedly crowding out private transfers. Whether social programs crowd out private transfers is an important question with worrisome implications, as private support represents an important fraction of households’ income and works as a risk sharing mechanism in developing countries. Furthermore, empirical evidence on the effect of public transfers on private transfers is mixed. This paper contributes to the literature by using a unique dataset from the quasi-experimental evaluation of a CCT in Colombia and an empirical strategy that allows us to correct for pre-existing differences between treated and control groups. Our results suggest that the public transfer did not crowd out private transfers, neither in the short-run nor in the middle-run. Instead, it increased the probability of receiving support in cash, in kind, and in non-paid labor from different private sources by approximately 10 percentage points. Moreover, we find that the monetary value of private transfers increased by 32-38% for treated households. – Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Conditional cash transfer, Public transfer, Private transfers, Inter-household transfers, Crowding-out
9 (RLIN) 29141
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Journal of Social Policy
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP CASH TRANSFER
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2022-01-18 50(3), Jul, 2021: p.511-532 AR126048 2022-01-18 Articles

Powered by Koha