| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01432nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
220202b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Liebig, Michael |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Interrogating ‘hyphenated cultures’ India’s strategic culture and its intelligence culture |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Journal of Defense Studies |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
15(3), Jul-Sep, 2021: p.9-40 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
In the late 1950s, the concept of 'political culture' was first developed. Towards the end of the Cold War, scholars in International Relations (IR) theory and security studies developed the concept of 'strategic culture'. Over a period, state bureaucracies were thematised by scholars of comparative politics leading to the concept of 'bureaucratic culture'. Lastly, in the second decade of the twenty-first century, a comparative turn in intelligence studies began to emerge with the concept of (national) 'intelligence culture'. Some of these concepts have not yet been in much use, nor have they been thoroughly theorised—some even less so empirically operationalised. This paper discusses the 'hyphenated' inter-relationship of these cultures and even explores the historical origins of India's intelligence culture, particularly in Kautilya's Arthashastra. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Strategic culture, Intelligence culture, India’s strategic culture |
| 9 (RLIN) |
29460 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Journal of Defense Studies |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
CULTURE |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
