Two routes to precarious success: Australia, New Zealand, COVID-19 and the politics of crisis governance (Record no. 519433)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02216nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 220315b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Bromfield, Nicholas and McConnell, Allan |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Two routes to precarious success: Australia, New Zealand, COVID-19 and the politics of crisis governance |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | International Review of Administrative Sciences |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 87(3), Sep, 2021: p.518-535 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Australia and New Zealand are routinely presented as sharing more in common than the federal and unitary systems separating them. As two modernising Antipodean settler societies, their governing trajectories have embraced waves of public administration/management reform. Shared pathways seem matched by their relative, although precarious and fragile, early successes in the crisis challenges of COVID-19. This article contextualises and examines one crucial point of separation: two very different crisis governance routes to such outcomes. Australia’s federal variant of multi-level governance, more used to addressing diverse regional challenges than shared national threats, has been characterised by an evolving balancing act of multi-jurisdictional agendas and bureaucratic–political conflicts. By contrast, New Zealand’s unitary system of governance, well-versed in the centralisation of power, has produced lower levels of intergovernmental conflict. Our analysis of these differing pathways also makes a contribution to our conceptual understanding of successful crisis governance. Points for practitioners Administrative arrangements based around federal or unitary systems are both quite capable of contributing to successful outcomes. Essential for both are inclusive crisis discussions that are consistent with the norms of the respective systems. Success can be fragile, especially in a pandemic. Appropriate inclusive discussions can facilitate responses to cascading crisis developments and act as a safeguard against complacency. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Coronavirus, Crisis management, Public administration, Public management |
| 9 (RLIN) | 30455 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | International Review of Administrative Sciences |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2022-03-15 | 87(3), Sep, 2021: p.518-535 | AR126344 | 2022-03-15 | Articles |