Consolidated advantage: New organizational dynamics of wage inequality (Record no. 519868)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01995nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220511b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Wilmers, Nathan and Clem, Aeppli
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Consolidated advantage: New organizational dynamics of wage inequality
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc American Sociological Review
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 86(6), Dec, 2021: p.1100-1130
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc The two main axes of inequality in the U.S. labor market—occupation and workplace—have increasingly consolidated. In 1999, the largest share of employment at high-paying workplaces was blue-collar production workers, but by 2017 it was managers and professionals. As such, workers benefiting from a high-paying workplace are increasingly those who already benefit from membership in a high-paying occupation. Drawing on occupation-by-workplace data, we show that up to two-thirds of the rise in wage inequality since 1999 can be accounted for not by occupation or workplace inequality alone, but by this increased consolidation. Consolidation is not primarily due to outsourcing or to occupations shifting across a fixed set of workplaces. Instead, consolidation has resulted from new bases of workplace pay premiums. Workplace premiums associated with teams of professionals have increased, while premiums for previously high-paid blue-collar workers have been cut. Yet the largest source of consolidation is bifurcation in the social sector, whereby some previously low-paying but high-professional share workplaces, like hospitals and schools, have deskilled their jobs, while others have raised pay. Broadly, the results demonstrate an understudied way that organizations affect wage inequality: not by directly increasing variability in workplace or occupation premiums, but by consolidating these two sources of inequality. – Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Wage inequality, Stratification, Organizations, Workplaces, Occupations
9 (RLIN) 31118
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Sociological Review
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP WAGES
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2022-05-11 86(6), Dec, 2021: p.1100-1130 AR126649 2022-05-11 Articles

Powered by Koha