Good corp, bad corp, and the rise of b corps: How market incumbents’ diverse responses reinvigorate challengers (Record no. 521107)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02502nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 221215b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name KimLink, Suntae and Schifeling, Todd
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Good corp, bad corp, and the rise of b corps: How market incumbents’ diverse responses reinvigorate challengers
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Administrative Science Quarterly
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 67(3), Sep, 2022: p.674-720
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Social movements challenge incumbents and drive institutional change by introducing market alternatives—new products and organizational forms that embody an alternative institutional logic. Research has shown that in response to market alternatives, incumbents resist through heterogeneous behaviors: incumbents maintain their commitment to the dominant logic, effectively marginalizing challengers, while also ostensibly endorsing the alternative logic and often successfully coopting challengers. Although incumbents’ strategic responses to pioneering market alternatives are well documented, we do not know how their heterogeneous behaviors affect new waves of challenger mobilization and how these mobilizations may differently address the hazards of cooptation and marginalization. We investigate the rise of the B Corp (Certified B Corporation) movement against the backdrop of both ongoing shareholder supremacy and rising corporate social responsibility (CSR) among incumbent corporations. Our multi-method, multi-stage investigation reveals that heterogeneous incumbent behaviors encourage new waves of challenger mobilization by seeding divergent mobilizing frames. This variety can lead to a paradoxical form of mobilization in which challengers dynamically balance the tension between their movements’ focus on expansion and purity, rather than prioritizing one over the other. The B Corp movement demonstrates how achieving this balance may help challengers avoid cooptation or marginalization, sustain their challenge against incumbents, and achieve more-transformative change. For incumbents, our findings show that both resistance to and the ostensible embrace of alternative logics may stave off immediate challenges but can also invigorate future challenges that pose substantive threats to the dominant logic. – Reproduced
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Paradoxical mobilization, New organizational forms, Social movements, Institutional change, Social entrepreneurship.
9 (RLIN) 34352
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Administrative Science Quarterly
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP SOCIAL CHANGE
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2022-12-15 67(3), Sep, 2022: p.674-720 AR127668 2022-12-15 Articles

Powered by Koha