| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01217pab a2200169 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180718b2002 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Hendriks, Carolyn |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: roles, tensions and incentives |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2002 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
p.64-75. |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
|---|
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Mar |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
There are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens' juries. These innovative processes, known collectively as citizens ` forums, challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be `bystanders', `information providers', and ultimately `process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to. - Reproduced. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Interest groups |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Policy making |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Australian Journal of Public Administration |
| 909 ## - |
|---|
| -- |
52143 |
