| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01217nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
230501b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Gaur, Ratika |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Public order (V sedition) VS freedom of speech and expression - A legal discourse on the limits of Indian rationality in the public sphere |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Economic and Political Weekly |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
58(11), Mar, 11-18 2023: p.33-39 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
Post-independence judicial rulings on the right to freedom of speech and expression have produced two contradictory lines of precedents on the restriction of “public order” under Article 19(2). The first is a “tendency-driven test” which reads public disorder as synonymous with “undermining the security of the state” and therefore sedition, while the second is a “consequence-driven test,” which separates sedition from public disorder, based on the temporal dimensions of proximity and proportionality. The underlying question at stake in either case, however, is that of determining the exercisable limits of an average Indian’s rationality within the public sphere.- Reproduced |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Economic and Political Weekly |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
FFREEDOM OF SPEECH |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
