Revisiting the academic–practitioner divide: Evidence from computational social science and corpus linguistics (Record no. 524841)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01653nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 240124b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Walker, Richard M. et al |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Revisiting the academic–practitioner divide: Evidence from computational social science and corpus linguistics |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Public Administration Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 83(6), Nov-Dec, 2023: p.1599-1617 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | As a design science, public administration is focused on addressing real-world problems. However, within public administration argument and evidence on the relevance of academic research to practice agendas is equivocal. We investigate the “academic–practitioner divide” using computational social science techniques to identify the topics of “academic,” “academic–practitioner,” and practitioner corpora over a 25-year period. Topic modeling results of the 50 topics identified in each of these corpora suggest that the topics of academics and practitioners have more differences than similarities: nearly seven-tenths of the identified topics differ between the practice corpus and the academic and academic–practice corpora. Corpus linguistics analysis is applied to contrast the keyness of topics over time, and the results confirm the largely different agendas of the corpora albeit with some convergence on governance and outcomes. Corpora examined in this article is largely suggestive of a lack of relevance of academic research to practice agendas. – Reproduced https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.13724 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Public Administration Review |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-01-24 | 83(6), Nov-Dec, 2023: p.1599-1617 | AR130647 | 2024-01-24 | Articles |