Narrating communist repression in and outside the courtroom: The case of former prison commander Alexandru Vișinescu and its resonance with (societally) available ‘narrative worlds’ (Record no. 525622)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02483nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 240328b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Kristine, Avram |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Narrating communist repression in and outside the courtroom: The case of former prison commander Alexandru Vișinescu and its resonance with (societally) available ‘narrative worlds’ |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Social and Legal Studies |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 33(1), Feb, 2024: p.82-103 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | In 2016, Alexandru Vișinescu was sentenced to 20 years in prison for his actions as a prison commander five decades earlier. This article explores the epistemic function of this “landmark case” by contrasting the judicial narrative with the narratives of the participants in the trial, i.e., the civil parties, and spectators, i.e., the university students representing the younger generation. The accounts of the survivors’ families, while showing great similarities with the judicial account, considerably broaden the setting and locus of responsibility and place Vișinescu's story in the larger context of communist repression. University students, by contrast, have very limited knowledge of the adjudicated events, reflecting their de-contextualised understanding of the past. This understanding is an expression of what I call the available narrative world, including publicly accessible narratives and discourses, but also subjective stories from the private sphere. In the Romanian context, characterised by perpetuated silences about the communist past, the narrative world available to university students is restricted and offers little resonance for the judicial narrative, making its integration into existing knowledge structures difficult. Consequently, I argue that the reception and acceptance of judicial narratives varies according to their resonance with societally available narrative worlds. – Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09646639221144001 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Alexandru Vișinescu - Landmark case - Judicial narrative - Civil parties - Spectators - University students - Survivors’ families - Communist repression - De-contextualised understanding - Available narrative world - Publicly accessible narratives - Subjective stories - Romanian context - Perpetuated silences - Societally available narrative worlds - Resonance and integration |
| 9 (RLIN) | 51459 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Social and Legal Studies |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | JUDICIARY |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-03-28 | 33(1), Feb, 2024: p.82-103 | AR131418 | 2024-03-28 | Articles |