Cultural tariffing: Appropriation and the right to cross cultural boundaries (Record no. 526762)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02175nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 240624b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Oshotse, A., Berda, Y. and Goldberg, A. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Cultural tariffing: Appropriation and the right to cross cultural boundaries |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | American Sociological Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 89(2), Apr, 2024: p.346-390 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Why are some acts of cultural boundary-crossing considered permissible whereas others are repudiated as cultural appropriation? We argue that perceptions of cultural appropriation formed in response to the emergence of cultural omnivorousness as a dominant form of high-status consumption, making boundary-crossing a source of cultural capital. Consequently, the right to adopt a practice from a culture that is not one’s own is determined on the basis of the costs and benefits one is presumed to accrue. People express disapproval at boundary-crossing if they believe it devalues or extracts value at the expense of the target culture. We call this process cultural tariffing. We test our theory in a between-subject experimental design, demonstrating that individuals who enjoy a privileged social position, as inferred from their social identity or socioeconomic status, have less normative latitude to cross cultural boundaries. This is explained by perceptions that these actors are either devaluing or exploiting the target culture. While symbolic boundaries and cultural distinction theories are inconsistent with our results, we find that Americans who are disenchanted about group-based social mobility are the most likely to be outraged by cultural boundary-crossing. Cultural tariffing, we therefore posit, is a form of symbolic redistribution.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00031224231225665 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | - Cultural boundary-crossing - Cultural appropriation - Cultural tariffing - High-status consumption - Social identity - Symbolic redistribution - Devaluation and exploitation - Privileged groups - Group-based social mobility - American perceptions |
| 9 (RLIN) | 55078 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | American Sociological Review |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | CULTURE |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-06-24 | 89(2), Apr, 2024: p.346-390 | AR132337 | 2024-06-24 | Articles |