Picturing deliberation: How dissatisfied citizens make sense of it (Record no. 527311)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01911nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 240822b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Does, Ramon van Der and Petit, Guillaume |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Picturing deliberation: How dissatisfied citizens make sense of it |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | International Political Science Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 45(3), Jun, 2024: p.301-315 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | What makes politically dissatisfied citizens enthusiastic about deliberation? And what makes them hate it instead? Based on a picture task embedded in a series of focus groups conducted in Belgium, we argue that differences in sense-making help to explain why dissatisfied citizens (do not) support deliberation. We focus on two groups of dissatisfied citizens: non-partisan activists and politically disadvantaged citizens. For both groups, we find that when they thought of deliberation as low-key, informal discussion, they linked it to respectful communication and beneficial outcomes; when they thought of it as formalized, structured discussion, their appraisals became much more negative. For researchers of deliberation, our results make clear that we should be careful in asking citizens what they think about ‘deliberation’ without inquiring into the way they interpret it. For deliberation practitioners, our findings underline the relevance of integrating informal interactions into the design of deliberative institutions.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01925121221139056 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Deliberation, Politically Dissatisfied Citizens, Sense-Making, Informal Discussion, Non-Partisan Activists, Politically Disadvantaged, Focus Groups, Belgium, Deliberative Institutions, Structured Discussion, Citizen Perceptions, Communication Outcomes, Institutional Design |
| 9 (RLIN) | 57033 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | International Political Science Review |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-08-22 | 45(3), Jun, 2024: p.301-315 | AR132757 | 2024-08-22 | Articles |