Indian Institute of Public Administration

Your cart is empty.

Self-efficacy, prosocial impact, and self-legitimacy as psychological predictors of judicial officer performance (Record no. 527728)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02958nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240918b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hamm, J.A. et al
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Self-efficacy, prosocial impact, and self-legitimacy as psychological predictors of judicial officer performance
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Public Administration Review
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 84(4), Jul-Aug, 2024: p.710-725
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc The current work explores three potential facilitators of judicial performance. Participants in a state-wide survey of judicial officers (response rate = 33.9 percent) completed self-report measures of self-efficacy, prosocial impact, and self-legitimacy as well as subjectively perceived performance. Objective performance data collected by the state court administrative office were then merged with the survey data. Latent variable analysis confirmed the three predictor constructs' separability, and although all four concepts were correlated, self-efficacy was the sole independent predictor of subjective performance. This study explores psychological facilitators of judicial officer performance, focusing on self-efficacy, prosocial impact, and self-legitimacy. Based on a state-wide survey of judicial officers (response rate 33.9 percent) combined with objective performance data from the state court administrative office, latent variable analysis confirmed the distinctiveness of the three constructs. Results show that self-efficacy is the sole independent predictor of subjective performance and the only significant correlate of objective performance. Mediation analysis further suggests that prosocial impact and self-legitimacy indirectly influence performance through self-efficacy. The findings highlight the central role of self-efficacy in judicial performance, while also demonstrating how prosocial impact and self-legitimacy facilitate its development, offering insights into psychological dimensions of judicial effectiveness. An unplanned mediation analysis suggested significant indirect effects of self-legitimacy and prosocial impact on subjectively assessed performance through self-efficacy. Regarding objective performance, self-efficacy emerged as the only significant correlate or predictor. The research therefore empirically demonstrates the empirical distinctiveness of self-efficacy, prosocial impact, and self-legitimacy and provides some exploratory support for a causal model whereby self-efficacy provides the proximal impact on performance but is itself facilitated by prosocial impact and self-legitimacy.- Reproduced


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.13723
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Judiciary, Judicial Performance, Self-Efficacy, Prosocial Impact, Self-Legitimacy, Psychological Predictors, Latent Variable Analysis, Mediation Effects, Subjective Performance, Objective Performance, Public Sector Psychology
9 (RLIN) 58237
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Public Administration Review
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP JUDICIARY
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2024-09-18 84(4), Jul-Aug, 2024: p.710-725 AR133162 2024-09-18 Articles

Powered by Koha