Grounding in the unconscious: “The field” in psychosocial organizational ethnography (Record no. 528018)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02200nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 241104b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Kaya, Didem Derya Özdemir and Fotaki, Marianna |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Grounding in the unconscious: “The field” in psychosocial organizational ethnography |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Organization |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 31(6), Sep, 2024: p.929-951 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Psychosocial research, which explores the unconscious and affective dynamics of organizational and social phenomena from critical perspectives, often adopts ethnographic methods. However, its locus, the unconscious, has an obscure, diffuse and dynamic nature that calls into question two central assumptions of conventional organizational ethnography: that an organization is a self-contained physical (research) site, and ethnographic research is best led by participant observation. The unconscious is produced by countless agents dispersed across time and space, making it impossible to readily identify a research site. Furthermore, psychosocial phenomena cannot be physically demarcated because a multitude of discourses, imagery, psyches, bodies, and objects are enmeshed in them. These raise contentious ontological, epistemological, and methodological questions for psychosocial researchers. In this article, we ruminate on “the field” in psychosocial organizational ethnography, seeking a robust epistemological and methodological approach to constructing and dwelling in an unconscious research site. Drawing on Lacanian psychoanalysis, we present a conceptual discussion of these issues and translate them into ethnographic methods illustrated by examples from the authors’ research. By critically re-evaluating the question of “the field,” we contribute to ethnographic studies of organizational phenomena with “fuzzy fields” without self-evident boundaries that draw on diverse onto-epistemologies. Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13505084221148640 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Fuzzy fields, “Lacan, Organizational ethnography, Psychosocial ethnography, The field, the unconscious |
| 9 (RLIN) | 48518 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Organization |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-11-04 | 31(6), Sep, 2024: p.929-951 | AR133446 | 2024-11-04 | Articles |