Impact of firm ownership type on organizational commitment and citizenship behaviour (Record no. 528039)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02446nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 241105b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Vidyut Dhir, Lata Das, Suranjan and Chatterjee, Debmallya |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Impact of firm ownership type on organizational commitment and citizenship behaviour |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Management and Labour Studies |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 49(3), Aug, 2024: p.389-416 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | In today’s globalized scenario, where advancements in technologies have facilitated people to connect, communicate and collaborate, and where organizations are striving to create an ecosystem that develops sustainable competitive advantage, people issues become a key factor. Organizations, therefore, require an understanding of the business scenario, organizational context and employee characteristics that influence employee behaviour and their workplace relationships as well as their intentions to stay. Though all organizations expect their employees to act with a sense of trust and commitment, the business context of family- and non-family firms are unique and different. While family firms are characterized by the family’s value system and emotions in building strong employee engagement, non-family firms are transactional and driven by outcomes. The study explores differences in organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour between family- and non-family firms, and it draws on the tenets from the Social Exchange theory. The data has been collected from 634 dyadic responses captured at two levels—employees’ self-reported commitment levels and their citizenship behaviour rated by their managers. Our results show that, in the Indian context, the employees of family firms demonstrate a higher affective, continuance and normative commitment as compared to those of non-family firms. However, the two groups did not differ significantly in their organization citizenship behaviour. It was also found that the relationship between organizational commitment and citizenship behaviour was stronger in employees of family firms than in employees of non-family firms.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0258042X231204413 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Organizational commitment, Organizational citizenship behavior, Family firms and non-family firms, Firm ownership type. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 48558 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Management and Labour Studies |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-11-05 | 49(3), Aug, 2024: p.389-416 | AR133467 | 2024-11-05 | Articles |