Do land banks mean progress toward socially equitable urban development? Observations from New York state (Record no. 528054)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02397nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 241105b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Small, Zachary and Minner, Jennifer S. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Do land banks mean progress toward socially equitable urban development? Observations from New York state |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Urban Affairs Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 60(1), Jan, 2024: p.272-303 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Local governments view land banks as an improvement to the municipal management of foreclosed property. Critics contend that land banks wield too much power, concentrate demolitions in poor and majority neighborhoods of color, and have unfortunate parallels to the flawed, top-down policies of mid-twentieth century urban renewal. Examining land banks through a lens of social equity and reparative planning, this research asks “To what extent do land banks in New York state work toward equitable urban development?” Interviews with land-bank leaders, property acquisition and disposition data, and spatial analysis of neighborhood dynamics were triangulated in a comparative case study of three land banks in New York state communities. Although land-bank leaders show an awareness and desire to address issues of equity, the authors observed that more community engagement, expanding partnerships with nonprofits, and shifts in approaches to demolition could provide more equitable outcomes in disinvested communities. Some land banks had clearly adopted policies aimed to acknowledge and address the role land banks can and should play in addressing historical inequities. Whether that commitment to equity will remain strong into the future remains an open question. In a COVID-19 context, land banks were operating with significantly reduced inventories and resources. More resources could be provided to land banks from Federal and State sources to support equity initiatives. But those resources should be provided under the condition that land banks become vehicles for repairing past White supremacist and structurally racist policies that created the uneven landscapes that land banks were created to address.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10780874231169923 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Land banks, Vacant property, Social equity, Demolition, Reparative planning. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 48588 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Urban Affairs Review |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | URBAN DEVELOPEMENT |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-11-05 | 60(1), Jan, 2024: p.272-303 | AR133482 | 2024-11-05 | Articles |