Participatory bias and participatory neighborhood governance:Reanalyzing the most-likely case of the Stockholm neighborhood renewal program (Record no. 528107)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01837nam a22001577a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 241112b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hertting, Nils
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Participatory bias and participatory neighborhood governance:Reanalyzing the most-likely case of the Stockholm neighborhood renewal program
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Urban Affairs Review
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 60(2), Mar, 2024: p.674-705
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Strategies for revitalizing marginalized neighborhoods often include participatory innovations. According to the participatory bias argument, however, participatory governance arrangements benefit the privileged rather than the poor. In the present article, the validity of this argument is examined by analyzing how individual resources and social positions relates to recruitment to, participation within, and outcomes derived from participation in a most-likely case of bias in participatory neighborhood governance. Although the privileged were overrepresented in recruitment, the pattern was less clear regarding influence within the processes, and quite the opposite regarding certain outcomes of participation. Also in a most-likely case for bias, participatory neighborhood governance may induce empowerment among poor. Based on the observation that participants that differ with regard to available resources and social positions also have different motives for participation, a mechanism-based account regarding why and how bias in early phases under certain conditions may produce empowering outcomes is proposed.- Reproduced

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10780874231203919
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Participatory neighborhood governance, Participatory bias, Neighborhood renewal, Most-likely case, Stockholm.
9 (RLIN) 48653
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Urban Affairs Review
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
Subject DIP URBAN DEVELOPMENT
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2024-11-12 60(2), Mar, 2024: p.674-705 AR133534 2024-11-12 Articles

Powered by Koha