Collaborating on the carceral state: Political elite polarization and the expansion of federal crime legislation networks, 1979 to 2005 (Record no. 528327)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01926nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 241129b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Duxbury, Scott W. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Collaborating on the carceral state: Political elite polarization and the expansion of federal crime legislation networks, 1979 to 2005 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | American Sociological Review |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 89(4), Aug, 2024: p.650-683 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Lawmakers are routinely confronted by urgent social issues, yet they hold conflicting policy preferences, incentives, and goals that can undermine collaboration. How do lawmakers collaborate on solutions to urgent issues in the presence of conflicts? I argue that by building mutual trust, networks provide a mechanism to overcome the risks conflict imposes on policy collaboration. But, in doing so, network dependence constrains lawmakers’ ability to react to the problems that motivate policy action beyond their immediate connections. I test this argument using machine learning and longitudinal analysis of federal crime legislation co-sponsorship networks between 1979 and 2005, a period of rising political elite polarization. Results show that elite polarization increased the effects of reciprocal action and prior collaboration on crime legislation co-sponsorships while suppressing the effect of violent crime rates. These relationships vary only marginally by political party and are pronounced for ratified criminal laws. The findings provide new insights to the role of collaboration networks in the historical development of the carceral state and elucidate how political actors pursue collective policy action on urgent issues in the presence of conflict.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00031224241257614 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Punishment, Networks, Policy, Political polarization, Collaboration. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 49154 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | American Sociological Review |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-11-29 | 89(4), Aug, 2024: p.650-683 | AR133720 | 2024-11-29 | Articles |