How the first revolution affected the second: The setback of 1927 for the Chinese communist party revolution in the 1920 (Record no. 528491)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02134nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 241210b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Zhou, Luyang |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | How the first revolution affected the second: The setback of 1927 for the Chinese communist party revolution in the 1920 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Modern Asian Studies |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 58(2), Mar, 2024: p.448-484 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | The Bolsheviks’ world revolution encountered setbacks in the 1920s. Among the bloodiest of these was the massacre of 1927 when the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) entire central leadership was killed in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (GMD) coup. Existing explanations highlight Moscow’s miscalculation, infighting within the Kremlin, Soviet advisers’ information dilemma, and the CCP leaders’ political inexperience. This article compares the opening stages of the Bolshevik (or Russian) and Chinese Communist Party revolutions to explain why the 1927 setback became a catastrophe. It argues that the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 caused fundamental changes, which thwarted any attempt to replicate the 1917 victory in the post-1917 world. The CCP in 1927 faced three disadvantages that the Bolshevik Revolution had engendered: a misleading myth about the October Revolution, a Bolshevized system of repression created by Soviet advisers to the GMD, and the ‘red scare’ in Japan and British Southeast Asia, which blocked members of the CCP from escaping overseas. This article draws on leaders’ biographical materials to compare the two parties’ learning from foreign revolutions, records in suffering repression, and experiences as overseas refugees. The comparison shows that the Bolsheviks did not face these three disadvantages before 1917.- Reproduced https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/how-the-first-revolution-affected-the-second-the-setback-of-1927-for-the-chinese-communist-party-revolution-in-the-1920s/7D0C6A44168744E01CA6172E48F64DC2 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Revolution, Repression, Wave, Russian, China, International. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 49394 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Modern Asian Studies |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-12-10 | 58(2), Mar, 2024: p.448-484 | AR133883 | 2024-12-10 | Articles |