Mainstream parties’ construction of populist discourse in Australia’s temporary migration policy (Record no. 530721)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02112nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 250710b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Yu, Kyoung-Hee and Wright, Chris F. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Mainstream parties’ construction of populist discourse in Australia’s temporary migration policy |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Organization |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 32(3), Apr, 2025: p.395-414 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Growing alarm has been expressed about populism in mainstream political parties, yet the vast majority of scholarship investigating populism has documented the role of radical right populist parties rather than that of mainstream parties. This article draws on non-essentialist understandings of populism—the idea that populism is a central aspect of democracy and not restricted to the realm of radical political parties and “populist” leaders—to examine how mainstream political leaders discursively articulate the antagonism between “the people” and the institutional order. We also examine how mainstream party leaders, who are likely to be deeply embedded in the institutional order, negotiate tensions between the institutionalized system and populist articulation. We study this in the Australian context, which is appropriate for examining populism in mainstream political parties given that far-right and far-left parties have gained much smaller shares of electoral support in Australia than elsewhere. Our findings indicate that mainstream party leaders discursively construct the idea of “the people” by homogenizing disparate social demands and claiming their right to represent the community as a whole. In doing so, these leaders must negotiate pressures from the institutionalized order in the form of clientelism and accountability. This article contributes insights on the reconciliation of contemporary populism with institutionalized settings and processes.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13505084231212641 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Migration policy, Political leaders, Political parties, Populism, Skilled migration. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 54981 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Organization |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2025-07-10 | 32(3), Apr, 2025: p.395-414 | AR136506 | 2025-07-10 | Articles |