Regulating public property: The account of the homeless (Record no. 530969)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02291nam a22001457a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 250722b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Viljoen, Sue-Mari |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Regulating public property: The account of the homeless |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Social & Legal Studies |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 34(3), Jun, 2025: p.439-457 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | A global socio-economic problem concerns the unlawful occupation of public spaces. At a time when states are more inclined to adopt welfare-orientated, inclusive social policies, property rules continue to forbid the homeless from exercising those activities that should ideally be done in private. The City of Cape Town serves as an interesting case study to critically reflect on social policies and laws that regulate the use of public property when rough sleeping is not only excessive, but perhaps even normatively accepted. The article reflects on the social dilemma of an emerging conflict between property rules (specifically antisocial behavior laws) and what has become normatively conventional in the streets, sidewalks, and public parks of the City. Antisocial behavior laws are enforced irregularly as the homeless are informally pardoned therefrom; this can lead to civic hostility and more social violations. The regulatory framework pertaining to street people is also analyzed considering the constitutional directive to distribute land/dwellings. Property is inaccessible for the most destitute - the centrality of property is overlooked in the state's pursuit to not only provide access, but also enable the vulnerable to live dignified, self-sustaining lives. For the street population, the freedom to perform every-day acts is socially controlled by the property system to that of state forbearance, shaped by an indefinite norms-based understanding of where certain activities are considered reasonable. This is a unsustainable, inhumane practice that prejudices the entire community and the urban environment.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09646639231225582 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Social control, Rough sleeping, Housing policy, Antisocial behavior, Quality of life policing, Broken window theory, Housing rights, Access to property, Redistribution. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 55521 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Social & Legal Studies |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2025-07-22 | 34(3), Jun, 2025: p.439-457 | AR136689 | 2025-07-22 | Articles |