Race, gender and beauty in instructional ratings: A quantile regression approach (Record no. 530988)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01844nam a22001457a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250722b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Raju, Sudhakar
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Race, gender and beauty in instructional ratings: A quantile regression approach
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Journal of Social and Economic Development
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 27(1), Apr, 2025: p.1-19
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc The objective of this paper is to apply quantile regression (QR) to analyze the effect of ascriptive characteristics such as beauty, gender and race on teaching evaluations. QR offers significant methodological advantages for studying issues that involve unequal outcomes at various points of a skewed distribution. While QR has been applied to other forms of discrimination (age, caste, obesity, etc.), it has not been specifically applied to discrimination in teaching evaluations. Using an unusual dataset originally compiled by Hamermesh and Parker (H–P 2005) on beauty, I re-analyze the dataset using QR. While the original paper by H–P focused only on the effect of beauty on teaching evaluations, I find evidence of other biases. The striking result here is not the impact of beauty on evaluations. Beauty, by itself, does not exert much of an effect. Gender, however, has a more pronounced effect and when combined with race tends to result in significant negative effects at various points of the quantile distribution. When contrasting these findings of bias with more recent ones, not much seems to have changed over the last two decades.- Reproduced

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40847-024-00338-4
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Teaching evaluations, Instructional evaluations, Discrimination, Bias, Beauty, Race, Gender, Quantile regression, Hamermesh and Parker (2005).
9 (RLIN) 55554
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Journal of Social and Economic Development
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2025-07-22 27(1), Apr, 2025: p.1-19 AR136750 2025-07-22 Articles

Powered by Koha